Updated March 2026

CIENCE vs Grupo Noa International.

Compare CIENCE, powered by graph8 and informed by Tenbound, with Grupo Noa International. Review pricing, contracts, technology, strengths, tradeoffs, and where the CIENCE ecosystem wins.

115

Client proof

named case studies

151

Industries

B2B categories served

14

Setup motion

day launch path

GN

Vendor

Grupo Noa International

vs

System

CIENCE

CIENCE logo

Decision brief

Start with the operating model.

Grupo Noa International is a vendor comparison. CIENCE is a system comparison: managed execution, graph8 platform, and Tenbound method in one operating model.

Cost

Grupo Noa International

$2,500 to $8,000/month

CIENCE

$2,000/month management plus SDR capacity at cost

Commitment

Grupo Noa International

3 month minimum commitment

CIENCE

Month-to-month contract structure

Platform

Grupo Noa International

Proprietary tools

CIENCE

graph8 audience data, intent, orchestration, and reporting

Best fit

Grupo Noa International

Grupo Noa International's core service with its standard pricing model

CIENCE

Multichannel execution, graph8 data, and flexible SDR capacity

01 / Cost

What do we pay before results are clear?

Grupo Noa International

Grupo Noa International: $2,500 to $8,000/month

CIENCE

CIENCE: management plus SDR capacity at cost

02 / Commitment

How much contract risk are we taking?

Grupo Noa International

Grupo Noa International: 3 month minimum commitment

CIENCE

CIENCE: month-to-month

03 / Data

Who owns the audience and signal layer?

Grupo Noa International

Separate purchase may be required

CIENCE

graph8 intent signals and audience data included in the system

04 / Motion

Is this a vendor or a full pipeline system?

Grupo Noa International

Monthly retainer

CIENCE

CIENCE execution, graph8 platform, Tenbound method

Side-by-side

The full comparison matrix.

Keep the matrix short enough to scan, but specific enough to show what changes when the buyer chooses a platform-backed operating model.

Technology platform

Grupo Noa International

Proprietary tools

CIENCE

graph8 AI orchestration, intent data, and multichannel execution built in

SDR pricing model

Grupo Noa International

Monthly retainer

CIENCE

At-cost via Talent Cloud with no agency markup

Contract terms

Grupo Noa International

3 month minimum commitment

CIENCE

Month-to-month contract structure

Research backing

Grupo Noa International

No dedicated sales development research arm named in source data

CIENCE

Tenbound research and training connected to CIENCE execution

Outreach channels

Grupo Noa International

Often email plus LinkedIn

CIENCE

Email, phone, LinkedIn, and programmatic ads through graph8

Data included

Grupo Noa International

Separate purchase may be required

CIENCE

graph8 intent signals and audience data included in the system

Setup time

Grupo Noa International

Weeks to months

CIENCE

14-day setup motion from source GTM page

02 / What they do well

Grupo Noa International strengths.

01

Competitive pricing for budget-conscious companies

02

Strong cold calling capabilities

03

Experience with event marketing and trade show lead capture

03 / Tradeoffs

Where buyers should look closer.

01

3-month minimum contract commitment

02

Limited digital channel capabilities (email, LinkedIn)

03

No AI or technology platform: manual processes

04 / CIENCE ecosystem

A vendor comparison is really an operating-model comparison.

The source page positions CIENCE as a three-part ecosystem: CIENCE for managed execution, graph8 for the GTM platform, and Tenbound for research, training, and sales development method.

01

CIENCE managed SDR execution

02

graph8 AI platform and audience data

03

Tenbound research and SDR training

05 / Where CIENCE wins

The advantages from the source data.

01

CIENCE is a graph8 company: full access to graph8 AI platform for intelligent campaign orchestration

02

Multichannel coverage: email, phone, LinkedIn, and ads

03

Month-to-month contracts with at-cost SDR pricing

04

115 published case studies with enterprise clients

Grupo Noa International

Best fit.

Teams that need Grupo Noa International's core specialization and are comfortable with the pricing and contract model.

CIENCE

Best fit.

Teams that need multichannel outreach, built-in AI data, flexible contracts, and at-cost SDR pricing without managing several vendors.

07 / Detailed analysis

Source comparison narrative.

Grupo Noa and CIENCE differ most in technology and channel coverage. Grupo Noa is a traditional telemarketing operation: strong at cold calling but limited in digital channels. CIENCE combines SDR talent with the graph8 AI platform for multichannel outreach.

Grupo Noa's pricing ($2,500 to $8,000/month) is competitive but requires 3-month minimums. CIENCE's at-cost SDR model through the Talent Cloud offers month-to-month flexibility with transparent pricing.

The biggest gap is technology. Grupo Noa uses manual processes and standard CRM tools. CIENCE's graph8 provides AI-powered campaign orchestration, intent data, and audience intelligence: capabilities that significantly improve targeting precision and response rates.

CIENCE offers comparable pricing with far more capability: multichannel outreach, AI-powered targeting, and the graph8 platform that Grupo Noa simply doesn't have.

Review ratings

Grupo Noa International ratings from source data.

Clutch

4.6/5

FAQ

Grupo Noa International vs CIENCE.

01

Is Grupo Noa International cheaper than CIENCE?

Grupo Noa's starting price ($2,500/month) is slightly lower, but they require 3-month minimums. CIENCE starts at $2,000/month for campaign management plus at-cost SDR rates with month-to-month flexibility, often resulting in comparable total costs.

02

Does Grupo Noa offer multichannel outreach?

Grupo Noa specializes primarily in cold calling with limited email capabilities. CIENCE provides full multichannel orchestration across email, phone, LinkedIn, and programmatic ads through the graph8 platform.

03

How do Grupo Noa reviews compare to CIENCE?

Grupo Noa has a 4.6/5 on Clutch. CIENCE has reviews across 7 platforms (G2, Clutch, UpCity, GoodFirms, TrustRadius, Gartner) and 115 published case studies with companies like Okta, Yamaha, and Shutterstock.

04

Which is better for enterprise companies?

CIENCE is the stronger choice for enterprise needs. With 1,000+ clients, a scalable Talent Cloud, and the graph8 platform, CIENCE handles enterprise-level SDR deployments. Grupo Noa is better suited for mid-market companies with simpler outbound needs.

Compare with an operator

See how CIENCE stacks up against Grupo Noa International for your ICP.

Bring your target market, meeting goal, and current tool stack. CIENCE will map cost, ownership, timeline, and execution model.